Re: Caution on LOG_PARALLELISM
Sriram Kumar wrote:
>Good that it becomes a hidden parameter in 10g. The bug number that
>was given to me was 4008013 but was not table to see the bug details.
Your search returned no hits!
The combination of key words and attributes you were searching for did
not retrieve any results.
This bug is probably under double secret probation by dean Wormer.